A Dance of Whole and Part
What if the building blocks of reality aren’t as fixed as they seem? What if the things we call "wholes" or "parts"—a person, a tree, an idea—exist in a state of flux, only settling into one role or the other when we look at them? This is the holon reimagined: not just a static piece of a system, but a quantum entity, shimmering in superposition, entangled across contexts. It’s a mind-bending twist on an old idea, and it might just change how we see ourselves and the world.
Holons, Meet Quantum Weirdness
The term "holon" comes from Arthur Koestler’s 1967 book The Ghost in the Machine. A holon is something that’s both a whole unto itself and a part of something bigger. You’re a holon: a complete individual, yet part of a family, a team, a society. A cell is a holon too—self-contained, yet embedded in an organ. Holons are the Lego bricks of systems, versatile and dual-natured.
But what if that duality isn’t static? Imagine a holon as a quantum entity, existing in a superposition of "whole" and "part"—not locked into either, but holding both potentials until observed. In quantum mechanics, particles can be in multiple states at once (say, spinning up and down) until measured, when they "collapse" into one. Apply that to a holon: it’s neither just a whole nor just a part—it’s both, until the moment you define it.
Entangled Identity
It gets wilder. Picture the holon as an entangled particle. In quantum physics, entangled particles are linked so that measuring one instantly reveals something about the other, no matter the distance. Now, think of a holon’s "whole" and "part" states as entangled. When you see me as a whole—say, an individual making a choice—you instantly know I’m a part in another context, like a citizen in a nation. Flip it: see me as a part of a team, and you instantly grasp I’m a whole elsewhere, with my own thoughts and agency. It’s not a slow deduction; it’s an immediate, inherent knowing.
In IT speak, it’s like a variable with no fixed value until queried. Ask the system, "Is this a whole?" and it returns "Yes"—but the "part" state is still there, tied to it. Ask "Is this a part?" and the answer flips, with "whole" lurking in the background. The holon doesn’t pick a side; it exists in a fluid, observer-dependent dance.
Living the Quantum Holon
What does this look like in real life? Take yourself. You’re sitting there, a whole person—your own mind, your own story. Then someone calls you "team member," and your part-ness snaps into focus, tied to a project or a goal. The moment shifts again—now you’re "parent" or "friend"—and your wholeness reemerges in a new light. Each observation collapses the superposition one way, but the other state doesn’t vanish; it’s entangled, instantly knowable in the next glance.
Or consider a tree. As a whole, it’s a towering thing of roots and leaves. Observe it as part of a forest, and its role in the canopy or soil network takes over—yet its wholeness as "tree" is still there, ready to resurface. The quantum holon isn’t about losing one identity for another; it’s about holding both, revealed by the lens you choose.
Why This Matters
This isn’t just a thought experiment—it reframes how we navigate the world. If holons (us, things, systems) are quantum-like, then our roles aren’t rigid. You’re not just a cog in the machine or just a free agent; you’re both, flickering based on who’s looking and why. It’s liberating and unsettling: your identity isn’t pinned down, but shaped by context and observation.
It also hints at deeper connections. If holons are entangled across their states, then knowing one thing as a part (say, a worker in a company) might instantly illuminate its wholeness (a person with dreams). This could shift how we treat each other—less as fixed pieces, more as dynamic entities, whole and part woven together.
Beyond the Binary
Koestler’s holons already bridged "whole" and "part," but the quantum spin takes it further. It’s not a compromise between two roles—it’s a superposition that defies choosing. Unlike nested systems where parts stack neatly into wholes, the quantum holon floats free, entangled across contexts, collapsing only when we pin it with a label. And even then, the other state lingers, a ghost in the system.
Next time you think of yourself—or anything—pause. Are you a whole? A part? Or are you hovering in between, a quantum holon waiting for the next observation to tilt the scale? Maybe the truth isn’t in the answer, but in the entanglement itself.
This is a joy to find. I am new here to substack today. I think in very complex endogenous math and have my own thoughts on this. I'm seeking the courage to jump in and write. This is the first online space I've found with this kind of thinking. I also found Michael Rollaine's writing today. https://shapeofsoup.substack.com/
You speak of "weird" quantum effects and, in the sense of choosing one's fate, or acting as Fate, rather than the other meaning, I think you are spot on the money.
https://www.etymonline.com/word/weird
I think the ancient Druids of Gaul Britain and Ireland may have intuited/known this, too.
https://www.etymonline.com/word/Druid
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Druid - please see under "Philosophy," there, at least.
And, if any Jesus from Nazareth said anything to the effect that "In my Father's House are many mansions," I guess - actually, I assume - he was speaking of any number of parallel universes/cosmoses, too.
I believe the same beggar spoke interchangeably of his/our "Father's House" and of "the Kingdom of God/the Father/Heaven/the Heavens/the Skies" as a metaphor, as Eckhart Tolle has suggested, for what, were he with us today, he might call "the realm of formless consciousness" - or that realm - "superposition?" - in/from which, once we have accessed it (true agency/free will), we can determine or co-create the very nature of any cosmos we....wish?
Thank you very, very, VERY much, indeed, for your most stimulating writings, quite unlike anyone else's I'm aware of!
Comfort and joy, and "God" rest you merry!
And THANK YOU!
Tom.
tomkellyvet@gmail.com