Content may be King but Context is Queen.
An intriguing perspective on semantics and meaning.
We are suggesting that the relationships and connections between words - the "negative space" - is more crucial for creating meaning than the words themselves. This has some interesting parallels in linguistics, the philosophy of language, and quantum physics, to name a few of the disciplines being woven here into a new innerstanding.
In linguistics, the concept of syntagmatic relations - how words relate to each other in a sequence - is crucial for meaning. The same word can have very different semantic implications depending on its context and relationship to surrounding words.
Our use here of "negative space" is a reminder of the linguistic concept of paradigmatic relations - the implicit contrasts between a word and others that could have been used in its place. This "absent presence" of alternative words does shape meaning in subtle ways.
The idea of meaning emerging from relationships rather than discrete units echoes concepts in structural linguistics and semiotics. Ferdinande de Saussure, for instance, argued that linguistic signs derive their meaning from their differences from other signs, not from any inherent properties.
Extending this to "all scales and scopes down to the fundamental nature of reality" is a fascinating leap. It brings to mind ideas from quantum physics about the importance of relationships and entanglement, where the properties of particles are not inherent but emerge from their interactions and measurements.
This perspective challenges our usual way of thinking about meaning as contained within words or things. It suggests a more holistic, interconnected view of semantics and perhaps reality itself.
POST SYNERGY
I really appreciate the way you’ve woven together ideas from linguistics, semiotics, and even quantum physics to highlight how meaning emerges through relationships and context. This reminds me of Gestalt Language Processing (GLP), where meaning is derived from the whole rather than individual elements. It might be interesting to explore how GLP fits into this framework, particularly in terms of negative space and relational meaning.